Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] why so slow?
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:37:52 +0200
- From: Pietro Zuco <pietro@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] why so slow?
- References: <200205311633.49105.pietro@example.com> <874rfig6fr.fsf@example.com>
- Organization: Linux
- User-agent: KMail/1.4.1
Hello. Thankyou! I tried xtoolwait and for example kmail and other x applications start faster. In the .xinitrc file I put exec startkde first and after the lines that the man xtoolwait tells to write. In that man say: " Startup the window manager first" that would means that I have to write exec startkde before the rest of the lines right? Pietro. On Tuesday 02 July 2002 05:22, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > As pointed out, MS preloads certain crucial (to its marketing and > legal defense) programs into memory. This is why Linux typically > starts up in a 10th of the time of Windows (and much of the time taken > by Linux is the distro's stock install kernel trying to init drivers for > nonexistent hardware ;-). > > Most *nix apps support multiple windows, and some kind of IPC > protocol. I forget what it is with Netscrap/Mozzerilla, but there is > a protocol to send an URL to a running browser. X?Emacs has > gnuclient. So if you _know_ you're going to be using the app a lot, > you start it at login, go get some coffee, and thereafter configure to > use the IPC protocols to create new windows quickly not start new > instances slowly. Eg, for X?Emacs, just set EDITOR=gnuclient in your > environment and everything is easy. > > (Note to vi abusers: I'm just talking about what I know; of course > EDITOR=vi works just as fast, but not as well ;-) And that's a new > instance of vi, which doesn't help Pietro understand the idea.) > > Also, you can often reduce startup time by use of xtoolwait, which > typically reduces the amount of time for windows to appear so that you > can do some work. The total startup time can actually be slightly > longer, but you don't have to wait for your xdaliclock (which takes > forever to appear) to pop up before the first xterm does.
- Follow-Ups:
- [tlug] Re: why so slow?
- From: Tobias Diedrich
- References:
- [tlug] why so slow?
- From: Pietro Zuco
- Re: [tlug] why so slow?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] ro
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] GUI first
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] why so slow?
- Next by thread: [tlug] Re: why so slow?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links