Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 01:25:18 +0200
- From: David Santinoli <u235@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- References: <1025840239.10767.6.camel@example.com> <3d252762.4375%tadashi@example.com> <20020705152457.F11887@example.com> <20020705225640.B11974@example.com> <005501c22437$4f851c40$2b0aa8c0@example.com>
- Organization: fastpath.it
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:19:09AM +0900, Luke Kearney wrote: > > The type of OS is really irrelevant but hosting centers are interested in > what you are doing quite a lot of DC's won't accept porn and none will > accept spammers. I'd rather say "No _responsible_ datacenter will accept spammers". The huge amount of traffic spammers tend to generate has some appeal to which not everybody is immune. Sorry, Jonathan, it's not personal, but it seems that Exodus doesn't wear the whitest hat when it comes to that, and I wouldn't feel very comfortable sitting in the same /28 or even /24 of a SPEWS'ed scumbag. Cheers David
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- References:
- [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- From: Ryan Shaw
- Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- From: tadashi nagao
- Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- From: Martin Baehr
- Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- From: Luke Kearney
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links