Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] mozilla: really ready?
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:28:43 +0900
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] mozilla: really ready?
- References: <E17FoQA-0004Hb-00@example.com>
- Organization: Kobe University, Japan
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:50:56 +0900 shimpei@example.com wrote: > FWIW, I've been using Mozilla since 0.8.9 on both Linux > and Windows, and I've > only ever seen these bugs show up on Linux. That suggests > that it's either a > bug in Mozilla's X interface, or in X itself. Either > wouldn't surprise me. Even if it's an xfree4.1 bug probably there should be a workaround. On the other hand, I have never experienced this with any other application (be it konqueror, encompass, whatever), my guess is that the bug is in mozilla's X interface. I would be glad to try xfree 4.2.0 which has been out for almost a half year but still has not made it into debian. From Branden's page: [7 May] Do not expect an update on XFree86 4.2 until after Debian 3.0 ("woody") releases. If you want to know why XFree86 4.2 is not shipping as part of woody, read this. I know that dozens of users have been bashing him, but I also ask: Why can't we have it in unstable (or in experimental) at least ?! Answer: go package it for yourself! Yeah, right. Why don't we just package the whole distro. I would be using LFS or Gentoo then. -- B0Ti.
- References:
- Re: [tlug] mozilla: really ready?
- From: shimpei
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Mandrake vs. Red Hat
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] mozilla: really ready?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] mozilla: really ready?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] mozilla: really ready?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links