Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 23:40:52 +0900
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <20020407214654.A11332@example.com>; from mdoughty@example.com on Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:46:54PM +0900
- References: <8630C6BF-49EB-11D6-AD3E-000A27B4FC30@example.com> <001d01c1de05$e94b1820$8e00a8c0@example.com> <20020407205137.G12290@example.com> <20020407214654.A11332@example.com>
Matt Doughty (mdoughty@example.com) wrote: > Well, I think he said it had been solid for fstab, but that isn't really > the point now is it? As you noted before the dangers are endless: Right you are, my mis-read. Thanks for catching that. > and if you kill your system using webmin don't come back look for sympathy > or help because you will find none here. Help, probably. Sympathy, not likely. Willfully self-inflicted wounds usually gather little sympathy in these parts. Graphical configuration utilities that always do what they are supposed to do aren't totally evil but the problem with many of them is, as you note, that they let you configure stuff that you can't fix by hand if need be. In the case of NT and it's follow-ons, one can at least say in its defense that the graphical configuration utilities do what they are supposed to, and what they say they do. The problem with them is that they keep you in the dark about what they do, and worse, about the implication of your actions. That's why there are so many Exchange servers that are open relays (well, one reason. The fact that most versions of Exchange are open by default is another). That isn't to single out MS in particular, since it's in the nature of graphical config tools to let you do things you don't understand. MS can be blamed, however, for having a configuration system that is really, really hard to fix by hand if you bork it graphically. I don't really care whether people who know what they are doing use graphical tools or not, b/c as long as the tool itself isn't broken, a person who knows what s/he is doing will get it right. These people usually don't use graphical tools, though, having found that if you know what you're doing, it's easier to do it by hand than by PCD. This gives rise to the situation where the only people who are using graphical config tools are the ones who should be avoiding them like the plague - beginners. I think we would find a strong consensus among all experienced *nix users here that if you are a beginner, it is not only best practice but absolutely imperative that you stay away from GUI tools and learn to do things by editing your config files directly. Jonathan
- References:
- Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- From: Jim O'Connell
- Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- From: Marlo Rocci
- Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- From: Jonathan Q
- Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- From: Matt Doughty
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links