Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] partiton
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] partiton
- From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 09:47:12 -0700
- Content-disposition: inline
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <20020403182726.E20124@example.com>
- References: <000901c1dbbb$46594f70$1500a8c0@example.com> <20020403085210.GA30919@example.com> <20020403182726.E20124@example.com>
- Reply-to: Matt Gushee <mgushee@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:27:26PM +0900, Jim Tittsler wrote: > > There may be performance advantages to having multiple swap > partitions spread across different spindles, Yes, though this can have unexpected consequences, and it may take some experimentation to get right. I thought I could get better performance by putting swap on a separate disk from /usr, /opt, and /var .... but it turned out not to be so simple. The disk with the swap partition spins down when it's idle, so when my machine starts swapping, it has to wake up that disk first. So the net result is worse performance. Gotta fix that one of these days. -- Matt Gushee Englewood, Colorado, USA mgushee@example.com http://www.havenrock.com/
- References:
- [tlug] partiton
- From: hatsuhiro
- Re: [tlug] partiton
- From: Frank Bennett
- Re: [tlug] partiton
- From: Jim Tittsler
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Re: Disk geometry
- Next by Date: [tlug] April nomikai (was pre-divorce negotiations)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] partiton
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] partiton
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links