Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] grub vs lilo
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] grub vs lilo
- From: Matt Doughty <mdoughty@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:10:27 +0900
- Content-disposition: inline
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <20020222154504.3801.HIYORI13@example.com>; from hiyori13@example.com on Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 03:49:47PM +0900
- Mail-followup-to: Matt Doughty <mdoughty@example.com>, tlug@example.com
- References: <20020218172903.J1556@example.com> <20020219055155.GA23821@example.com> <20020222154504.3801.HIYORI13@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.4i-jp0
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 03:49:47PM +0900, YAMAGATA Hiroo wrote: > I got myself a 30GB hard disk and was having a lot of trouble getting > win2000 and linux on it together using lilo. lilo always fumbles finding > the /boot partition that I made below the 2GB border. > > And then I used grub, and wow, it works like a charm. So my question is, > what's the advantage of using lilo? Are there any know weakness of grub? > I'm curious. > -- It came about later than lilo? Other than comming on the scene later there isn't really a good reason to use lilo over grub. Grub has a better feature set, and is all around the more elegant solution. (now I'm sure someone will come up with a corner case to prove me wrong). --Matt
- Follow-Ups:
- [tlug] security dude....the puto story
- From: Pietro Zuco
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Login/SSH Scan Detection
- From: Matt Doughty
- Re: [tlug] Login/SSH Scan Detection
- From: A.Sajjad Zaidi
- [tlug] grub vs lilo
- From: YAMAGATA Hiroo
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Akiba Linuxcare tour
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Akiba Linuxcare tour
- Previous by thread: [tlug] grub vs lilo
- Next by thread: [tlug] security dude....the puto story
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links