Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a twisted use of lilo
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: a twisted use of lilo
- From: Fredric Fredricson <fredric.fredriksson@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 22:00:49 +0200
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Delivered-To: tlug@example.com
- List-Help: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=help>
- List-Post: <mailto:tlug@example.com>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=subscribe>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=unsubscribe>
- Old-Return-Path: <fredric.fredriksson@example.com>
- Organization: MYDATA automation AB
- References: <3B6DA405.DC730414@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <nh4YJ.A.L2.Pcab7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: fredric@example.com
2 minutes after posting the question I got the following idea: Would it be possible to add some meaningless kernel parameter and parse /proc/cmdline for it? /Fredric PS. I will test this as soon as possible but I am not completely sure it is a good idea....
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a twisted use of lilo
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Re: a twisted use of lilo
- References:
- a twisted use of lilo
- From: Fredric Fredricson <fredric.fredriksson@example.com>
- a twisted use of lilo
- Prev by Date: a twisted use of lilo
- Next by Date: Re: a twisted use of lilo
- Prev by thread: a twisted use of lilo
- Next by thread: Re: a twisted use of lilo
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |