RE: Routing problems

[Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>]

oops, didn't read the whole thing... was trying to multitask my brain on
about 5 diff. things this morning when I sent that out.  bah, mental
segfault, I guess :)

-----------------------------------------------------
Scott M. Stone <sstone@example.com>
Senior Technical Consultant - UNIX and Networking
Taos, the Sysadmin Company - Santa Clara, CA


-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:turnbull@example.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 5:05 PM
To: Scott Stone
Cc: 'tlug@example.com'
Subject: RE: Routing problems


>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Stone <SStone@example.com> writes:

    Scott> the problem is the netmask.

No, it's not.

    Scott> 192.1.1.230 and 192.1.2.230, each with a 255.255.255.0
    Scott> netmask, cannot talk to each other.

They can't anyway.  Look more closely at the topology.

-- 
University of Tsukuba                Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences       Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
_________________  _________________  _________________  _________________
What are those straight lines for?  "XEmacs rules."