Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: java question
- To: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
- Subject: Re: java question
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:57:30 +0900
- Cc: tlug@example.com
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20010614165520.X657@example.com>
- References: <3B278493.388731B4@example.com><20010614004711.B657@example.com><3B286744.CC3849EA@example.com><20010614165520.X657@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <K8j3zC.A.BQ.r6GK7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas O'Dowd <tom@example.com> writes: Thomas> this is because javac just sees that an exception may be Thomas> thrown during parseInt() and someInt may never be defined, Thomas> although we are looping to prevent that anyway Note that javac is correct here, as you are not catching all possible exceptions. Suppose the user SIGINTs, or the string creation routine ENOMEM's, for example. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: java question
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
- References:
- java question
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Re: java question
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
- Re: java question
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Re: java question
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Stallman (Was: Unicode TTF containing CJK?)
- Next by Date: Re: java question
- Prev by thread: Re: java question
- Next by thread: Re: java question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links