Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Apache question
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Apache question
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 23:11:28 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <F230Glrn8LOLP9r70j000003bc8@example.com>
- References: <F230Glrn8LOLP9r70j000003bc8@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <mYuhzC.A.8l.1ulE7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "JC" == Jean-Christian Imbeault <jean_christian@example.com> writes: >> It's not particularly serious, it just means that the processes >> didn't die right away. JC> Could this possibly lead to the creation of a zombie httpd JC> that could keep a connection open and busy? AFAIK a process becomes zombie at its termination if its parent has already exited without waiting for its (child's) termination. So zombie is actually a dead process, it can't keep any connection since it's dead. It only takes an entry in the process table. init should inherit a zombie and call wait(). The only thing I don't understand is why a zombie can keep existing for a long time?.. Viktor
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apache question
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com>
- References:
- Re: Apache question
- From: "Jean-Christian Imbeault" <jean_christian@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Very odd 'bash' problem in RH7.1 - What!?!!
- Next by Date: Re: Very odd 'bash' problem in RH7.1 - What!?!!
- Prev by thread: Re: Apache question
- Next by thread: Re: Apache question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links