Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: networking trouble
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: networking trouble
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:54:16 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C9840752059DA7C0@example.com>; from SStone@example.com on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:15:50AM -0700
- References: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C9840752059DA7C0@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <ra4LQ.A.OZG.vdzD7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Scott Stone (SStone@example.com) wrote: > Jonathan there's nothing wrong with his IP setup. It's perfectly valid to > use 192.168.0.0/16 as long as you dont try to advertise it to the internet It might work, but when you use a 255.255.0.0 netmask, you're trying to say "My network is the /16 from 196.168.0.0 to 192.168.255.255" which, of course, it's not. As far as everyone knows, his network is 192.168.1.0/24. Just because you aren't advertising a network to the Internet, that doesn't mean you shouldn't set everything up correctly. Jonathan
- References:
- RE: networking trouble
- From: Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux and ADSL
- Next by Date: Re: networking trouble
- Prev by thread: RE: networking trouble
- Next by thread: RE: networking trouble
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links