Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- To: "'tlug@example.com'" <tlug@example.com>, Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
- Subject: RE: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- From: Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:42:35 -0700
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <hAupr.A.iVD.tyZD7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
yeah it was very strange... as I said when I put 7.1 on it I had it check the partition for bad blocks - didn't find a single one. and usually when an IDE disk fails on Linux.. (actually, ALWAYS, when an IDE disk fails on Linux), the kernel will log ATAPI bus reset and IDE seek errors, and none of that happened in this case. I didn't even rebuild the kernel on that box, either, nor anything else that could be defined as "core" (ie, libc). all updates came from "Big Red" :) so anyway, congrats to RH for f*cking up a distribution in such a way that causes actual data loss. Even I never did *that*. Sure I had some betas that wouldn't boot, but those were betas[1] [1] don't even f*cking mention TurboLinux 1.4J. I *really* dont want to talk about that :) ----------------------------------------------------- Scott M. Stone <sstone@example.com> Senior Technical Consultant - UNIX and Networking Taos, the Sysadmin Company - Santa Clara, CA -----Original Message----- From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:turnbull@example.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:28 PM To: Scott Stone Cc: 'tlug@example.com' Subject: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL] >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Stone <SStone@example.com> writes: Scott> why? 7.0 did something that I've never, in over 6 years of Scott> using Linux, come across. For no reason at all, just Scott> COMPLETELY trashed my ext2fs file system to the point where Scott> /usr/lib was no longer a directory and /lost+found Scott> contained only spotty remnants of what used to be in there. Scott> No bad sectors on the disk I've seen this. I think it's a hardware problem in my case. It's a Fujitsu MO drive, media 217MB formatted IIRC. But the ext2fs would happily write past physical capacity and start reusing in-use blocks. And trashing directories. Including the /lost+found directory. Oops. Fortunately, that was for backup only and I found out about the problem before I needed it.... :-) Debian 1.2 (at that time), custom kernel 2.2.SingleDigit vintage, vanilla Linus sources, no patches. Didn't matter whether it was mke2fs /dev/sdc or fdisk /dev/sdc1, mke2fs /dev/sdc1. Red Hat _always_ fucks with the sources, and unless you read the RPM spec _and_ the patches, you never know what you're getting. "Trust Big Red" ... about as far as I could throw a sack with Bill Gates and Bob Young in it. As you say, I've never seen this on a fixed disk, and only on that particular hardware in fact. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: Sat, May 12 13:30- Next Nomikai Meeting: Fri, June (TBA) 19:30- Tengu Tokyo Eki Mae ----------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- Next by Date: Perl: how to do is x in @example.com
- Prev by thread: Interesting SPAM Competition Submission: FW: Uncle Sam Wants You!!
- Next by thread: Re: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links