Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: firewalling behind NAT?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: firewalling behind NAT?
- From: "Jean-Christian Imbeault" <jean_christian@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 00:13:55 -0000
- Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <0YQhcC.A.BgG.L9aC7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Jonathan Q <jq@example.com> wrote: >What happens if the cracker compromises the router? Mmm-hmm, >Houston, we have a problem :-) True. I also have a firewall between me and my router. I use gol/e-access. Which brings me to my question: Does the router-type modem provided by have telnet access? It's my belief that it doesn't. If a router doesn't have telnet access, doesn't that make it that much more difficult to hack into? My paranoia level is average, and I figure if you can't even telnet to my router you'll have have a tough time hacking into my LAN. But that's just me ... Jc _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: firewalling behind NAT?
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: firewalling behind NAT?
- Next by Date: Re: firewalling behind NAT?
- Prev by thread: Re: firewalling behind NAT?
- Next by thread: Re: firewalling behind NAT?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links