RE: Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9

[Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>]

they will either do the reverse dns or delegate it to me.  ISP is pacific
bell.  All the other DSL providers in this area went bankrupt.  Well,
Telocity is still around, but none of their line providers have service here
(Northpoint went bankrupt, Rhythms is about to, and Covad doesn't serve my
city at all).

nice thing is, I'm paying $150 up front to *own* these IPs.  That means that
PacBell is Not Allowed to change them, ever.  so they're really STATIC
static IPs :)  at least until pac bell changes their minds..

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jonathan Q [SMTP:jq@example.com]
> Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 4:15 PM
> To:	tlug@example.com
> Subject:	Re: Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9
> 
> Scott Stone (SStone@example.com) wrote:
> 
> > of that in the 2.2.x. kernel series that I could find.. I'm getting 5
> static
> > IPs and i want to have them all "behind" the firewall and NATted to the
> 
> Who's your DSL provider?  Will they give you reverse DNS for those
> or delegate reverse DNS to you?
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Next Technical Meeting:  Sat, May 12 13:30- 
> Next Nomikai Meeting:    Fri, June (TBA) 19:30- Tengu Tokyo Eki Mae
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp           Sponsor: Global Online Japan