Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: IPChains rules
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: IPChains rules
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 18:53:21 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103021030470.3103-100000@example.com>
- References: <3A9F6526.8D61A812@example.com><Pine.LNX.4.30.0103021030470.3103-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <yEt6MB.A.RbC.u72n6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "Tobias" == Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com> writes: Tobias> iptables also has the advantage of being a "stateful" Tobias> packet-filter, which can make the rules much simpler (in Tobias> case of a firewall you might basically just say "allow all Tobias> traffic from lan to the outside and allow only known Tobias> existing incoming connections") This kind of thing can be done with ipchains, too. It's just (AFAIK) that iptables has more convenient operators for doing what you want. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPChains rules
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- References:
- Re: IPChains rules
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- Re: IPChains rules
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: IPChains rules
- Next by Date: Re: IPChains rules
- Prev by thread: Re: IPChains rules
- Next by thread: Re: IPChains rules
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links