Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: problems with pow( ) in gcc
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: problems with pow( ) in gcc
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
- Date: 31 Jan 2001 14:39:08 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: "Stephen J. Turnbull"'s message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:15:19 +0900"
- Mail-Copies-To: never
- References: <20010131121646.2310.AKAMINE@example.com> <20010130225927.2d8aadcb.davidgn@example.com> <14967.37207.343214.534012@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <3X2h7D.A.M9G.uT6d6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull@example.com> writes in tlug@example.com: > `man pow' says ... > SYNOPSIS > #include <math.h> > double exp(double x); > double log(double x); > double log10(double x); > double pow(double x, double y); > It's arguable that the SYNOPSIS is the only big advantage of the man > format over info. :-) In this case, the synopsis is wrong. The only thing worse than no documentation is incorrect documentation. Solaris gets it right: Mathematical Library pow(3M) NAME pow - power function SYNOPSIS cc [ flag ... ] file ... -lm [ library ... ] #include <math.h> double pow(double x, double y); Info is just another Stallman NIHism. Man pages have worked fine for decades and too many recent software packages are ignoring it to the detriment of everyone. Shame on GNU and shame on KDE/Gnome HTML help.
- Follow-Ups:
- man or Info? Both!! [was: problems with pow( ) in gcc]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- problems with pow( ) in gcc
- From: Hector Akamine <akamine@example.com>
- Re: problems with pow( ) in gcc
- From: David Eduardo Gomez Noguera <davidgn@example.com>
- Re: problems with pow( ) in gcc
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: gcc upgrade
- Next by Date: Re: *.la and *.a
- Prev by thread: Re: problems with pow( ) in gcc
- Next by thread: man or Info? Both!! [was: problems with pow( ) in gcc]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links