Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]*.la and *.a
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: *.la and *.a
- From: Darren Cook <darrenj@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:13:56 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <irF4m.A.BFF.d_qd6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
What are *.la and *.a extensions? Comparing two redhat machines the freetype rpm 1.3.1-7 has these two extra files in /usr/lib compared to 1.3.1-5: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 199016 Dec 12 13:21 libttf.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Dec 12 13:32 libttf.so -> libttf.so.2.2.0 The link I can make by hand, but I'm wondering if I need the .a file as well? There is also a libttf.la there (on both machines). Darren
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: *.la and *.a
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Re: *.la and *.a
- From: Yuriy Syrota <rasta@example.com>
- Re: *.la and *.a
- From: Jake Morrison <jacob.morrison@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: gcc upgrade
- Next by Date: Re: *.la and *.a
- Prev by thread: Re: shell state of mind
- Next by thread: Re: *.la and *.a
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links