Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: the future of Linu(s/x)
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: RE: the future of Linu(s/x)
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:45:46 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-2022-jp"
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <3A74E23E.6AA486BE@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <d1ffx.A.UpC.9ZOd6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
> "I don't believe open source works well for > commercial companies because they can't control > schedules," While I don't agree with this statement there are some elements of truth in it for a commercial entity. As you point out below corporate development has difficultly controlling its own schedules - this is true. On the other hand scheduling for a product is very important. What corporate development does have in its favor is the following: - ability to set priorities - accountability - quality control The last bullet may be contentious - you may be able to manage quality as part of an open source effort if you have all of the cards right (big if): - able to attract great developers - are in a position to manage the OS project - have a group with common vision, not too discordant > > I think the companies are forgetting they can't control schedules for > software development. Open source has little to do with it. >
- References:
- Re: the future of Linu(s/x)
- From: Darren Cook <darrenj@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: the future of Linu(s/x)
- Next by Date: Re: Memory for an old Acer Notebook
- Prev by thread: Re: the future of Linu(s/x)
- Next by thread: Re: the future of Linu(s/x)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links