Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: daemon vs nohup
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: daemon vs nohup
- From: Dmytro Kovalov <dmytro.kovalov@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:43:14 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 09 Dec 2000 16:41:32 +0900." <14897.57900.84902.426010@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <uMCt6C.A.l5G.bAuM6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
-> Just tried this: -> -> $ (my-prog&) -> -> It creates a daemon process. What's the (dis)advantages of using nohup -> if you just want your program to run after you have logged out? -> -> Viktor Until your my-prog doesn't try to write anything to stdout/stderr, there's no differences as far as I understand. Out of nohup'd program is redirected to nohup.out by default, in other case you're just loosing everything. Regards, Dmytro
- References:
- daemon vs nohup
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: NetBSD 1.5
- Next by Date: Re: Telnet/ssh connection refused
- Prev by thread: daemon vs nohup
- Next by thread: [FYI] Keymacs is Greeeeat !
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links