Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]apt questions
- To: tlug <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: apt questions
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 18:18:39 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <3A309FB8.52E0E900@example.com>
- References: <3A309FB8.52E0E900@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <I5cuh.A.HwF.PhKM6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "B0Ti" == B0Ti <9915104t@example.com> writes: B0Ti> I use /mnt/cdrom for mounting the cdrom, not the (i guess) B0Ti> default debian way which is /cdrom. Debian is massively urusai about policies. If it wants to mount on /cdrom, let it. It's not worth the aggravation of trying to thread through the scores of twisty little maze-like Perl modules all alike but all subtly incompatible to fix that kind of assumption. B0Ti> Also, it's giving me these annoying but otherwise harmless B0Ti> errormessages: B0Ti> Should I upgrade perl or apt to fix this? Debconf. This lossage is a standard feature of debconf. It will go away, only to be replaced by more lossage. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: apt questions
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- References:
- apt questions
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: apt questions
- Next by Date: Re: apt questions
- Prev by thread: Re: bttv was:apt questions
- Next by thread: Re: apt questions
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links