Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: ~ls
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: ~ls
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:18:30 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <14867.48987.940918.149044@example.com>; from vp@example.com on Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 08:04:59PM +0900
- References: <14867.48987.940918.149044@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <Es21d.A.XTB.8I8E6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 08:04:59PM +0900, Viktor Pavlenko wrote: > Someone here claims that it is possible to call ls so that it'll list > all files not specified in its argument, for instance, `ls *.c' prints > all files ending in .c, the problem is to print out all others. > > He says no pipes are allowed. > > I think it's not possible... beast:tom> ls d.a j.c p.c x.b beast:tom> ls ^*.c d.a x.b Tom. -- Thomas O'Dowd Have you had your noop today? tom@example.com http://www.nooper.com
- Follow-Ups:
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- References:
- ~ls
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com>
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links