Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: DSelect/base-passwd
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: DSelect/base-passwd
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:55:08 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <14864.62265.347572.858354@example.com>
- References: <3A10B915.14C93AF6@example.com><14864.62265.347572.858354@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <YaFODD.A.pjF.mtQE6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:09:29 +0900 (JST), "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com> said: Darren> In particular it wanted to upgrade base-passwd (see Darren> below), but then said it wants to change the home Darren> directory of postgres. But postgres is installed from Darren> source not .deb, and is under /usr/local/, so why is it Darren> intefering? In fact why had it created a postgres user Darren> before I'd even installed postgres? Is changing postgres Darren> to a 100+ uid the proper way to solve this? SJT> postgres is a system user. It has special privileges. SJT> Conventionally, such users are given "small" UIDs. The SJT> problem is that often the UID is hardcoded into the package SJT> in some way. If two packages expect to use the same UID, you SJT> have a problem. So Debian keeps a list of them, and sets SJT> them up in a convenient way so that they won't conflict. SJT> Basically the same way that telnet is always port 23, smtp SJT> port 25, and http port 80 (although UID assignment is SJT> normally not as necessary as with the "well-known ports" for SJT> network services). If postgreSQL itself doesn't enforce a particular uid for postgres user, why a pkg management program should do that?.. And is it worth learning how to use this program if you have to know and remember much more than you would have to if you just compiled the sources yourself? And also one day you will have to upgrade your package manager! Once I appreciated that rpm had an option to list all files in the package so that I could go and manually delete those of them that _were_ installed by rpm -i (rpm -e wouldn't run of course). No intention to start a fight over it, just my opinion :) Viktor
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DSelect/base-passwd
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- DSelect/base-passwd
- From: Darren Cook <darrenj@example.com>
- DSelect/base-passwd
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: DSelect/base-passwd
- Next by Date: Re: DSelect/base-passwd
- Prev by thread: DSelect/base-passwd
- Next by thread: Re: DSelect/base-passwd
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links