Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: "shawn" <shawn@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 20:57:07 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- References: <4.2.0.58.J.20001112182916.029b2c40@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <rfTQUC.A.qa.VWoD6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
I recently trashed my RedHat box ( :-) ) and decided to try FreeBSD on the rebound. After making my boot/rescue floppies from images downloaded from freebsd.org, I booted up and did the whole install onto a formatted HD via FTP. It went very smoothly, and installed without problems on the first try. Comparing that with my first RedHat experience, which took me 5 or 6 installs to get right, I was very happy. Granted, using RedHat for 2 years probably gave me a better foundation than I originally had for the RH install... Also, as Yamagata-san mentioned, I am VERY happy with the ports system, especially as compared to the RedHat rpm system. One of the most frustrating things I had dealt with using RH was broken dependencies. To install package A, you need B and C. Look for B, find you need D and E to install that. Look for D and you need F and G, etc. etc. With FreeBSD, you just cd into the directory of the port you want to install, type 'make' and it takes care of everything for you, including grabbing other necessary packages by FTP and automatically installing them. Bonus! :-) One other difference I have noticed is that FreeBSD uses a different system for NAT and Firewalling (as default) than RH did. I was using IPMasquerading w/ RH, but went with natd and ipfw with my FBSD install and am happy with the way that is working. I had been thinking of going with Debian as a RH replacement, but am happy with FBSD so far. I'll save Debian for another box. Just my 2 yen, Shawn ----- Original Message ----- From: "YAMAGATA Hiroo" <hiyori13@example.com> To: <tlug@example.com> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 6:39 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux > At 18:25 00/11/12 +0900, you wrote: > >How different is FreeBSD from Linux. I'm currently running Debian potato and > >wanted to try FreeBSD. Any potential pitfalls? Concerns? Advice? > > Well for what it's worth, I'm tinkering with OpenBSD these days, but > I don't see too much of a difference as long as you're being a simple user. > Some of the commands are different (like instead of mount -t iso9660 > you do mount_9660 or something), and i18n is non-existent in OpenBSD > (FreeBSD scores pretty highly in this respect), but not too different. > ssh comes almost default, and security concerns seem better than some > of the Linux distros (but I know a lot of people have a lot to say here...) > > And I kinda like their ports system that handles tar xzvf, configure, make, > make install with a single command. > > So, I'd say, try it out. Wait, is this off-topic (read heresy)? > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Next Technical Meeting: November 11 (Sat) 13:30 Place: LinuxProbe Hall > Next Nomikai (and Bonenkai!): December 15 (Fri) > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan > >
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: YAMAGATA Hiroo <hiyori13@example.com>
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- References:
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: YAMAGATA Hiroo <hiyori13@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Prev by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links