Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:05:53 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20001025153040.B21640@example.com>; from simon@example.com on Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 03:30:40PM +0100
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010240016480.5505-100000@example.com> <20001025153040.B21640@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <1pOS5.A.j6C.CF795@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Simon Cozens (simon@example.com) wrote: > of the FAQ taking this thread into account: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > 3.0 OCN > > OCN is a service offered by NTT; it looks like ISDN, smells like ISDN, > and requires an ISDN terminal adapter, but it isn't ISDN. It's an Well, it is in the sense that ISDN is what connects you to the OCN access point. The OCN network itself is apparently frame relay, or maybe some combination of frame and ATM. Under OCN, you and 20 other customers can all be connected to the same access point. While you may each have a 128K physical connection between yourselves and the access point, the uplink from the access point into the OCN network isn't a T-1 or anything like that. It could itself be 128K frame-over-ISDN (not certain of the uplink speed). So you have a lot of (potential) customers connecting to a small frame-relay uplink with no service level agreement; it's best effort, so you may get good bandwidth, or it may totally stink. Depends on how many other customers are on your node and using it when you are. > flavours: Economy is probably the one you want, but a misnomer at > 32,000Y a month. Compared to the cost of an ISDN leased line (between the NTT fee and the ISP fee, this will cost you over 100,000 yen a month, usually), it's economy. 32,000 yen is still a lot, but until the advent of DSL, OCN Economy was the best deal around for people who needed, but couldn't afford, a leased line. > exchange and their bandwidth usage. Personally, I had this service in > Jiyugaoka and managed to almost always get the full bandwidth, with > downloads averaging around 10 kilobytes/s. You were doing well. It could have been much worse. 10 kB/s isn't full speed 128K (I get over 14 on a 128 dialup). > Now, with ADSL approaching, I'd say the only reasons for getting OCN is > that you can run services freely, and that it's available pretty much > everywhere. You can run services freely on commercial-rate DSL, too, and for the price of: > month. The Professional service is 26,400Y a month, but gives > you 13 IP addresses, your own domain, primary DNS and all the > trimmings. Gee! Less than OCN Economy! Now OCN Economy doesn't look so economical :-) Jonathan
- References:
- Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- From: Tod McQuillin <devin@example.com>
- Re: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: NTT-ME was (Re: Metallic DSL in Tokyo)
- Next by Date: Cliff Miller sighting
- Prev by thread: Re: Public News Servers
- Next by thread: Tokyu CATV (was Re: Metallic DSL in Tokyo)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links