Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]distributed filesystems? GFS? Intermezzo?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: distributed filesystems? GFS? Intermezzo?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:36:27 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20001016135900.C19853@example.com>
- References: <20001016135900.C19853@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <9eBRNB.A.iDH.nXq65@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Tittsler <jwt-tlug@example.com> writes: Jim> Has anyone here compared/used InterMezzo or the Global File Jim> System (as alternatives to CODA)? Or have you come across Jim> any comparisons/warnings/raves/rants on the web? There used to be discussion and links on the Coda site. I don't recall exactly where; it may be in the papers section of the documentation directory. I don't know how up-to-date that stuff is. I'm pretty sure both intermezzo and GFS were mentioned, and the conclusion was basically "these are different animals with different goals, and it's pretty clear which is best in the majority of situations." -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- References:
- distributed filesystems? GFS? Intermezzo?
- From: Jim Tittsler <jwt-tlug@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: TLUG October nomikai meeting this Friday (10/20)
- Next by Date: digest
- Prev by thread: distributed filesystems? GFS? Intermezzo?
- Next by thread: digest
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links