Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: Split files?
- To: tlug@example.com
 - Subject: RE: Split files?
 - From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
 - Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 11:43:48 +0900 (JST)
 - Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 - In-Reply-To: <4.3.1-J.20001004113819.00c3dee8@example.com>
 - References: <4.3.1-J.20000928182332.00c308c0@example.com><4.3.1-J.20001004113819.00c3dee8@example.com>
 - Reply-To: tlug@example.com
 - Resent-From: tlug@example.com
 - Resent-Message-ID: <4Z4Hs.A.eAB.yzp25@example.com>
 - Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
 
>>>>> "hy" == YAMAGATA Hiroo <hiyori13@example.com> writes: hy> But when I checked the man page for tar, it doesn't contain an hy> -M option. This is the OpenBSD tar manual below, but I don't hy> expect tar to be so different among Unices. Is the -M option hy> a standard feature in tars? I thought that was part of the POSIX standard but I don't have a copy handy. Not that it really matters, tars generally don't comply with standards very much. They vary a lot. GNU's is particularly rife with extensions. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- References:
 
- RE: Split files?
 
- From: YAMAGATA Hiroo <hiyori13@example.com>
 Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: Split files?
 - Next by Date: Japanization
 - Prev by thread: RE: Split files?
 - Next by thread: RE: Split files?
 - Index(es):
 
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links