Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Slow browsing?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Slow browsing?
- From: Jim Tittsler <jwt-tlug@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 21:19:47 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10009212019360.759-100000@example.com>; from denismcm@example.com on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 08:23:11PM +0900
- Organization: 7J1AJH/AI8A Tokyo
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10009212019360.759-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <k4G8wD.A.wwB.V9fy5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 08:23:11PM +0900, Dennis McMurchy wrote: > "Yes, next time I'm browsing in Linux (still much slower than in > Windows, by the way)..." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > This makes no sense to me at all. Could it be true? And what would > the reason be? Perhaps he is really comparing Netscape 4.x on Linux to MSIE. I think MSIE "feels" faster because it can start to display a page and if necessary reflow[1] it as it downloads additional table elements... while Netscape 4.x waits until it has the whole table. [1] This feature worked well in MSIE 5.0, but seems broken in 5.5. -- Jim Tittsler, Tokyo ICQ: 5981586
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slow browsing?
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- References:
- Slow browsing?
- From: Dennis McMurchy <denismcm@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Slow browsing?
- Next by Date: B5 laptop recommendations?
- Prev by thread: Slow browsing?
- Next by thread: Re: Slow browsing?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links