Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: new webpage: rikai.com
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: new webpage: rikai.com
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 08:54:46 +0100
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <F79zoJDpz1Pjzc0cAov00004307@example.com>; from trudick@example.com on Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:28:10AM +0900
- References: <F79zoJDpz1Pjzc0cAov00004307@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <-gBaQ.A.ov.3Nev5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:28:10AM +0900, Todd Rudick wrote: > As for the efficiency concern expressed elsewhere, I don't see that. Rikai > has excellent connectivity No, it has abysmal connectivity - from me. The world is a very big place. To get from my host in Australia and read a web page in Japan, I have to go the long way round, starting with 20-odd hops via America to get to the proxy. If I had a version running client side, I have to go zero hops to get to the proxy. Which is more efficient? If I wanted to use Rikai on a file held on my local hard drive, corporate intranet ... -- "Irrigation of the land with seawater desalinated by fusion power is ancient. It's called 'rain'." -- Michael McClary, in alt.fusion
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: new webpage: rikai.com
- From: Todd.Rudick@example.com
- References:
- Re: new webpage: rikai.com
- From: "Todd Rudick" <trudick@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: new webpage: rikai.com
- Next by Date: Re: Displaying output from Computer on TV
- Prev by thread: Re: new webpage: rikai.com
- Next by thread: Re: new webpage: rikai.com
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links