Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: LAM/MPI Parallel processing
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: LAM/MPI Parallel processing
- From: Simon Valiquette <Simon.Valiquette@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 14:15:17 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- Organization: Fuji Xerox
- References: <FOEBIKDLMFBGOKGGBGDEGEMGCEAA.jshore@example.com>
- Reply-To: v.simon@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <n4hSt.A.i-F.sNIt5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: simon@example.com
Austin Kurahone wrote: > > Supprising that something like this just came up, I just got back from a > summer of hacking this stuff among otherthings in the US. > > Minor nitpick. Beowulf is the project at the CESDIS. Cluster would be a more > appropriate naming for the technology that you describe. I know about it, but so many people call a Beowulf any dedicated cluster of computers made for high-performance computing tasks that have their own private networking. Maybe it's just a kind of technical language evolution. > > By the way, the structure using a master that just dispatch jobs to > > slave computers are not suitable for me, because each nodes have to > > communicate with some others nodes, and that the amount of data is too > > big (say, easilly over one GB for a single simulation). > > Ouch, that's a lot of data. What kind of networking setup are you using. > Unless you've got really expensive interfaces Gig/E or Myrinet, I'd reconsider > doing something like this with a cluster... I'm thinking about putting two 100Mb/s network cards in each computer and using two special switching Hub. Their is many possible configurations and i'm not sure yet which one I will use. Using 1 Gb/s network card are a possibility, but I prefer to avoid using that. In fact, my problem is mainly money related. Otherwise, we would just run it on a supercomputer. But many others company don't have the budget to buy time at 300$/h on a Cray class supercomputer. Simon
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LAM/MPI Parallel processing
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: RedHat 6.1 and Japanese
- Next by Date: Re: RedHat 6.1 and Japanese
- Prev by thread: RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing
- Next by thread: Re: LAM/MPI Parallel processing
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links