Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: ICQ on http proxy
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: ICQ on http proxy
- From: simon@example.com (Simon Cozens)
- Date: 7 Aug 2000 09:36:47 GMT
- Delivered-To: simon-outgoing@example.com
- Organization: Earth.li Origins
- References: <lists.tlug/398E258A.D8ECBC1A@example.com> <lists.tlug/slrn8os9no.24f.simon@example.com> <lists.tlug/398E7973.B942D77D@example.com>
- Reply-To: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <Dn01lC.A.8L.bQoj5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: simon@example.com
- User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.3 (UNIX)
Simon Valiquette (lists.tlug): > Yes, I already thinked about that, but I did'nt because security >issues. I'm working in the Fujixerox Corporate Research Center, so we >really mind about security (email and JavaScript included). If we had >the right to use that kind of tricks, there would be no reasons for us >to use a very restrictive firewall. And they will never allow the port >used by ICQ to be open (and I fully agree with that), because the >Windows ICQ version have just too many security flaws. I forgot to add the magic bit: there's a reason I said port 443 of a remote machine. Set up an sshd running on a remote port 443, and try this: telnet yourproxy 8888 CONNECT externalbox:443 You should see: 200 Connection established SSH-1.5-1.2.26 How to combine this evilness with a portforwarding proxy is left as an exercise to the reader. -- Digital circuits are made from analog parts. -- Don Vonada
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ICQ on http proxy
- From: Simon Valiquette <simon.valiquette@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: G4 internal modem through NTT Mini-v MN128 TA
- Next by Date: Re: G4 internal modem through NTT Mini-v MN128 TA
- Prev by thread: Re: ICQ on http proxy
- Next by thread: Re: ICQ on http proxy
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links