Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: swap partition too small
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: swap partition too small
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:38:12 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007122325510.6095-100000@example.com>; from devin@example.com on Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 11:30:32PM +0900
- References: <20000712215850.F20336@example.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007122325510.6095-100000@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.2i
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 11:30:32PM +0900, Tod McQuillin wrote: > Is it really that bad? Have you looked at the linux vfs code lately? Therein be dragons. > I'd bet it's less than 1%. More. Plus everything else that's being scheduled at the time ... -- Chris
- References:
- Re: swap partition too small
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: swap partition too small
- From: Tod McQuillin <devin@example.com>
- Re: swap partition too small
- Prev by Date: Re: swap partition too small
- Next by Date: Re: swap partition too small
- Prev by thread: Re: swap partition too small
- Next by thread: Re: swap partition too small
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |