Re: tlug: Emacs/Xemacs Question

["Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>]

So basically the gist is that Xemacs is more bizarre (bazaar?) and more
abstract.  So it's the Picasso of Editors, then :)

Seriously, though, all kidding aside, XEmacs is clearly better from a
functionality perspective.  From a disk space perspective, they're both
fricking huge, with Xemacs being slightly more so than its RMS-consorting
counterpart.

Interesting that RMS would be involved so heavily with a 'cathedral' style
development, when he's been vilifying others for doing the same for years.

--------------------------
Scott M. Stone, CCNA <sstone@example.com>
UNIX Systems and Network Engineer
Taos - The SysAdmin Company 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Next Nomikai Meeting: June 16 (Fri), 19:00   Tengu TokyoEkiMae
Next Technical Meeting: July 8 (Sat) 13:30   Topic: TBA
--------------------------------------------------------------------
more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp        Sponsor: Global Online Japan