Re: tlug: 2.2.14 Vs. TurboLinux

["Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>]

On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Jonathan Q wrote:

> Scott M. Stone (sstone@example.com) wrote:
> 
> > sorry, just read Chris's reply.  I guess my 'educated' guess wasn't as
> > educated as I thought it was :)
> 
> I wondered if it might be an ncurses issue at first, too, but couldn't
> really prove or disprove it.
> 
> > btw, what's TL Server 1.0?  is that some really old distribution of TL or
> > are they numbering differently in Japan than in the USA?
> 
> It was released last year, under a different numbering scheme, which has now
> been pitched in favor or unification.  There was TL Server 1.0, 1.2, and
> now there is Workstation 6, Server 6, and Server SOHO 6.

we just have Workstation, Server, and Cluster Server here in the States.
Haven't seen Cluster Server yet.  I wonder if they're going to play up the
big security hole in Redhat's 'piranha' (web/ftp clustering software)
now..

--------------------------
Scott M. Stone, CCNA <sstone@example.com>
UNIX Systems and Network Engineer
Taos - The SysAdmin Company 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Next Technical Meeting: May 13 (Sat) 13:30 Temple University Japan
* Topic: Crypto and Security	Speaker: Chris Sekiya