Re: [Lingo] Bulgarian and Russian and Romanian (oh my?) (was: Alternatives to sed + awk)

["Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>]

Josh Glover writes:

 > they should be considered separate languages, while "languages" such
 > as Bulgarian and Macedonian are considered separate by at least one of
 > the peoples for reasons of national identity. I wonder if Serbian and
 > Croatian / Serbo-Croat fall into the latter camp.

I suspect they do, given the reputation that the Serbs have for
suppressing national identity.

As an economist, of course I prefer letting people name things as they
like and then measure the differences. :-)