=?UTF-8?Q?Re:_[Lingo]_Re:_Archives_should_now_ha?= =?UTF-8?Q?ndle_=E6=97=A5=E6=9C=AC=E8=AA=9E=E3=80=81English, _=D0=B8?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=91=D1=8C=D0=BB=D0=B3=D0=B0=D1=80=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B8?= =?UTF-8?Q?_/_=D0=A0=D1=83=D1=81=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9?=

["Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>]

Josh Glover writes:

 > Are these actually in Unicode? I know I've seen Sindarin and Quenya
 > fonts, as well as Dwarvish runes, Black Speech, etc. back in the day,
 > but I think they just mapped to ASCII.

Actually, they were most likely GR in ISO 8859.

 > What about Klingon?

AFAIK the Unicode Consortium has not added any of these so far because
they do not have a national or international standard to back them up.
Awf'ly parochial of them, to not accept a GSO (Galactic Standards
Organization) certification.

What you can do is map them into private space.  I'm fairly sure
that's how it's done in the Linux kernel.