tlug: 2.0.35

[Marcus Metzler <mocm@example.com>]

Scott Stone writes:
 > 
 > Is 2.0.35 broken?  I compiled a clean kernel on my main FTP server, using
 > fairly standard options, and apparently it got 2 lines past LILO and said,
 > 'giving up' and hung there... 
 > 
 > Also, the hfs_fs module does NOT like the header file changes in 2.0.35...
 > there seem to be quite a few header file changes from .34 to .35.... any
 > hints here?
i had no problems with 2.0.35, even my 3com 3c575 which didn`t work
with the pcmcia-cs-2.0.3 and kernel 2.0.34 worked again. I haven`t
compiled a lot of modules though. Not nearly what a standard TL dist
has. But the modules shouldn`t cause lilo to fail. 

Marcus

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Marcus Metzler
Department of Physics    | $B")(B $B#2#7#4!<#8#5#1#0(B
Toho University          | $B@example.com)A%66;T;0;3#2!<#2!<#1(B
Miyama 2-2-1, Funabashi, | $BElK.Bg3X(B  $BM}3XIt(B  $BJ*M}(B
Chiba 274-8510           | 
Japan			 |
e-mail : mocm@example.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
--------------------------------------------------------------
Next Meeting: 8 August, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30
featuring Linux on multiple platforms:
i386, Sparc, PA-Risc, Amiga, SGI, Alpha, PalmPilot, ...
Next Nomikai: September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp