Re: FML vs majordomo (was tlug: base64)

[craigoda@example.com]

From: Jim Schweizer <schweiz@example.com>
Subject: FML vs majordomo (was tlug: base64)
Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 15:40:27 +0900 (JST)


schweiz> On 31-May-98 craigoda@example.com wrote:
schweiz> > I think what I may propose is that we start
schweiz> > moving away from majordomo for some of the smaller mailing
schweiz> > lists on the TLUG server and move toward FML.  Then,
schweiz> > eventually move to FML for the main TLUG list.  
schweiz> 
schweiz> That would effectively hose eVote which AFAIK only works with
schweiz> majordomo. I could contact the developer and ask if she's
schweiz> interested in putting in FML support....

Jim,
I didn't realize that eVote worked only with majordomo.  I think that
the voting power of eVote is more important than the customizable
digest capabilities of FML.  We don't have many Japanese subject
lines on the TLUG list, so majordomo is probably better for us
on the main list right now.  We could maybe do something with
one of the sub-lists in the future.  I've just started to use
FML from the administrator's standpoint and wanted to bring it
up to people's attention. 

Regards,
Craig

----
Craig Oda   craigoda@example.com   http://tlug.linux.or.jp/~craigoda

--------------------------------------------------------------
Next TLUG Meeting: 13 June Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30
Featuring Stone and Turnbull on .rpm and .deb packages
Next Nomikai: 17 July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691
After June 13, the next meeting is 8 August at Tokyo Station
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp