[tlug] Re: Call for presenters - March 14th technical meeting

[John Fremlin <john@example.com>]

Edward Middleton wrote:
> Subversion was just an incremental improvement on RCS->CVS but probably
> still the best for a purely centralized repository approach.

I'd strongly support a talk that debunked this myth. That's like saying 
that you had best use horsemen if your army doesn't need to travel more 
than a few miles a day -- military science and version control systems 
have both moved on.

Just because you can use a system in a distributed way doesn't mean you 
can't use it with a central repository.

(I hate SVN.)