Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp
Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:58:05 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- References: <op.t756gdbtp3esx5@mail.gol.com> <200803171322.13584.daniel.ramaley@drake.edu> <20080317210112.T39931@isris.pair.com> <200803180822.19747.daniel.ramaley@drake.edu> <20080318155544.79e7efac.attila@kinali.ch> <20080322090456.GH5267@lucky.cynic.net> <20080331135150.aab7cce9.attila@kinali.ch>
Attila Kinali writes: > > > Yes, rsync is horribly inefficient in nearly all ways. > > > ...(ie, absolutely CPU limited). and then > Of course, my example is a bit on the extreme side, Do you not see the problem here?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] genkou youshi templates
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Ubuntu won't format a 2GB SD card as fat 16
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |