TLUG Mailing List

Mailing List Archive

tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Japanese Input

Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:42:33 +0900

From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@example.com>

Subject: Re: [tlug] Japanese Input

References: <2B29614385FE6F47BF39423C0AB1524E0B0BA4FA@example.com><417EA3B5.9060506@example.com>

User-agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Hi,

> in what aspects is atok better than canna/anthy/m17/uim/iiim/xim?
> 
> is the canna part (the kana->kanji conversion part) better?

ATOK should be better than other free alternatives in that
it can use their patented technology in doing the kana-kanji
conversion.

I had an impression that there are algorithms that are 
patented and cannot be used in free alternatives.


regards,
	junichi
Follow-Ups:

Re: [tlug] Japanese Input
From: Stephen J. Turnbull

References:

RE: [tlug] Japanese Input
From: Keith.Wilkinson

Re: [tlug] Japanese Input
From: Gábor Farkas

Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Japanese Input

Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Japanese Input

Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Japanese Input

Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Japanese Input

Index(es):

Date

Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links