Re: [tlug] and, back to gpg

[Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>]

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:53:09AM -0400, Josh Glover wrote:
> Quoth Stuart Luppescu (Sun 2004-08-15 01:13:00PM -0500):
> 
> > On ??, 2004-08-15 at 09:56 +0200, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> >
> > > They'll probably think that the digital signature is some kind of virus :o)
> > 
> > Not a joke. Whenever I send signed messages to the AERA (American
> > Educational Research Association) mailing list, I get a message back
> > saying messages with attachment type application/pgp-signature are
> > forbidden by the list. Some day I'll remember to not sign anything I
> > post to that list....
> 
> You could always use a Mutt send-hook. I use just such a one to prevent
> me from signing mails to my Grandfather, whose Outhouse Express effect-
> ively prevents him (a 78 year-old man) from being able to read my signed
> mails.


Or choose i for inline signature, which simply puts the sig inline in
the message, even for broken email clients.

(that is, when ready to send, hit p for sig choices, then choose i).




-- 

Scott 

PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Faith: Isn't it crazy how slayin' just always makes you
hungry and horny?
Buffy: Well... sometimes I crave a nonfat yogurt afterwards.

Attachment: pgp00028.pgp
Description: PGP signature