Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:57:30 +0900 (JST)
- Cc:
> libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so Holy Christ. RedHat just doesn't get it, do they? No, the two are not compatible. -- Chris "libfoo.so.major.minor" Sekiya
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |