TLUG Mailing List

Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] fonts, soo bad :-(

To: tokyolug@example.com

Subject: Re: [tlug] fonts, soo bad :-(

From: Godwin Stewart <gstewart@example.com>

Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:05:31 +0100

Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

In-reply-to: <000501c1bb5f$f7e5bc00$6f00a8c0@example.com>

Organization: Nope, none here, it's a mess ;o)

References: <001a01c1bad2$a2abef80$0100a8c0@example.com><20020221134424.1cbe38db.gstewart@example.com><000501c1bb5f$f7e5bc00$6f00a8c0@example.com>
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:15:37 +0900, "Pietro Zuco" <pietrozuco@example.com>
wrote to <tlug@example.com>:

> www.pietrozuco.com/snapshot3.jpg

Arial is a TrueType font. You might have better results using a Type 1
PostScript font such as Helvetica.

-- 
 ____________________________________________
| G. Stewart   --   gstewart@example.com |
| Port de Pontille, FR-37500 CHINON, FRANCE. |
 ____________________________________________
References:

[tlug] fonts, soo bad :-(
From: Pietro Zuco

Re: [tlug] fonts, soo bad :-(
From: Godwin Stewart

Re: [tlug] fonts, soo bad :-(
From: Pietro Zuco

Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] grub vs lilo

Next by Date: [tlug] Off Topic: Used Laptop

Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] fonts, soo bad :-(

Next by thread: [tlug] Test - Please disregard

Index(es):

Date

Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links