Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: port 113?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: port 113?
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 20:28:44 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105240616080.9541-100000@example.com>; from sven@example.com on Thu, May 24, 2001 at 06:24:40AM -0500
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105240616080.9541-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <QtoquD.A.7oC.bDPD7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Sven Simon (sven@example.com) wrote: > I noticed lots of dropped packages destined for port 113 on our servers > ever since I set the access-list on the cisco. No, you don't need this, shouldn't have this. In fact, why don't you post an nmap of that host here? Let us see what else it doesn't need. Jonathan
- References:
- port 113?
- From: Sven Simon <sven@example.com>
- port 113?
- Prev by Date: port 113?
- Next by Date: Re: port 113?
- Prev by thread: port 113?
- Next by thread: Re: port 113?
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |