Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ok this is NOT good
- To: "'tlug@example.com'" <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: ok this is NOT good
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 21:12:19 +0200
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C98407520572A36A@example.com>; from SStone@example.com on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:51:25AM -0700
- Mail-Followup-To: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>,"'tlug@example.com'" <tlug@example.com>
- References: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C98407520572A36A@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <70ytSC.A.soB.0wF86@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:51:25AM -0700, Scott Stone wrote: > yeah, files in lost+found I can deal with, but /usr/lib *exists*, it just > exists as a file with REALLY weird permissions. I dont think there's any > way to explicitly tell it "you're a directory, behave", is there? chmod > doesn't seem to be able to do it... If it's turned into a file, all directory entries should end up in lost+found with the next fsck... Otherwise it's really weird ^^;; -- Tobias nya~ni ?
- References:
- RE: ok this is NOT good
- From: Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
- RE: ok this is NOT good
- Prev by Date: RE: ok this is NOT good
- Next by Date: RE: ok this is NOT good
- Prev by thread: RE: ok this is NOT good
- Next by thread: RE: ok this is NOT good
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |