RE: Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9

[Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>]

hmm, I wonder if the FreeS/WAN people know about this... maybe they're
patching it in for the next release.  Oh well, I have nothing to connect my
ipsec stuff *to* at this point, so it's probably a moot point at least for
now.  New DSL goes in tomorrow, so tonight I get to migrate my new kernel
over and make sure all the stuff works right... had to up myself to 2.4.x
with iptables cuz I needed static NAT, and there's no clean implementation
of that in the 2.2.x. kernel series that I could find.. I'm getting 5 static
IPs and i want to have them all "behind" the firewall and NATted to the
outside on an as-needed basis... just like I would do with a PIX, if I had
one.. :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Tobias Diedrich [SMTP:ranma@example.com]
> Sent:	Monday, April 30, 2001 3:53 PM
> To:	'tlug@example.com'
> Subject:	Re: Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9
> 
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:47:25PM -0700, Scott Stone wrote:
> 
> > 1) Why would Alan have done this?
> > 2) Does anyone know what this part of sk_buff is generally used for?
> ie, is
> 
> My guess would be this has to do with the zero copy networking patches...
> I have read (IIRC in some recent Kernel Traffic issue) that they had to
> change
> the sk_buff structure for these.
> 
> -- 
> Tobias
> nya~ni ?
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Next Technical Meeting:  Sat, May 12 13:30- 
> Next Nomikai Meeting:    Fri, June (TBA) 19:30- Tengu Tokyo Eki Mae
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp           Sponsor: Global Online Japan