Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9
- To: "'tlug@example.com'" <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 00:52:52 +0200
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C98407520572A355@example.com>; from SStone@example.com on Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:47:25PM -0700
- Mail-Followup-To: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>,"'tlug@example.com'" <tlug@example.com>
- References: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C98407520572A355@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <v_HnZC.A.iXG.aze76@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:47:25PM -0700, Scott Stone wrote: > 1) Why would Alan have done this? > 2) Does anyone know what this part of sk_buff is generally used for? ie, is My guess would be this has to do with the zero copy networking patches... I have read (IIRC in some recent Kernel Traffic issue) that they had to change the sk_buff structure for these. -- Tobias nya~ni ?
- References:
- Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9
- From: Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
- Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9
- Prev by Date: Re: dchp server question
- Next by Date: RE: Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9
- Prev by thread: Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9
- Next by thread: RE: Something odd in 2.4.3-ac9
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |