Re: IPChains rules

[jwb@example.com (Jim Breen)]

ST>>   But they shouldn't have polluted the namespace by using
ST>> TCP/IP terminology for states which do not correspond accurately to
ST>> TCP states.

My reaction too. I started to reply along those lines, but then stopped
and said to myself: "that sort of thing can wait until I'm back in Oz
teaching Internet Architecture & Protocols".    8-)}

(My students lose marks if they say "TCP/IP" when they really mean just
IP or UDP/IP or ICMP/IP.)


Jim
-- 
Jim Breen  [jwb@example.com  http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/]
Visiting Professor, Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of 
Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Japan
+81 3 5974 3880         [$B%8%`!&%V%j!<%s(B@$BEl5~30Bg(B]