Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Group Etiquette]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [Group Etiquette]
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:39:57 +0100
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <14811.58605.513155.614948@example.com>; from turnbull@example.com on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:18:21AM +0900
- References: <FOEBIKDLMFBGOKGGBGDEKEEHCGAA.jshore@example.com> <Pine.GSO.4.05.10010040655090.27676-100000@example.com> <20001004150042.B16984@example.com> <14811.58605.513155.614948@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <ir9ghB.A.KqD.lBF35@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:18:21AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > NO, NO, NO, NO, NO. OSS means _somebody_ can fix it. _You_ don't > have to. _You_ can pay your dues in cash, if you like. OK, I'll weaken my assertion: if there is a significant problem in OSS, it'll piss off a sufficient number of capable people that one of them will get around to fixing it. -- "If that makes any sense to you, you have a big problem." -- C. Durance, Computer Science 234
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Group Etiquette]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: [Group Etiquette]
- References:
- RE: [Group Etiquette]
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
- RE: [Group Etiquette]
- From: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>
- Re: [Group Etiquette]
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Re: [Group Etiquette]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- RE: [Group Etiquette]
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Source
- Next by Date: Re: Open Source
- Prev by thread: Re: [Group Etiquette]
- Next by thread: Re: [Group Etiquette]
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |