Re: RedHat 6.1 and Japanese

[Mike Fabian <mfabian@example.com>]

SL Baur <steve@example.com> writes:

> Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com> writes in tlug@example.com:
> 
> > *laugh* It was hypothetical.  My reference to Canna was a reference
> > to the Canna security patch that TL glommed onto ...
> 
> Canna isn't used by default in the TL distributions that make money so
> your example doesn't make any sense.  Since the source code is so old
> and decrepit it would be wiser to retire it the same way Red Hat did.

In what way did RedHat retire Canna? 

-- 
Mike Fabian   <mfabian@example.com>